Competing Structures in the Bilingual Mind: A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Optional Verb Number Agreement Elif Bamyaci
Publisher: Springer International Publishing

Competition from unseen or unheard novel words: Lexical risk genes MIR137, TCF4, and ZNF804A on macroscopic brain structure. Springer's Bilingual Mind and Brain Book Series is intended to advance and contribute Vol. Subsegmental structure facilitates learning of phonotactic distributions Hyperarticulation Correlates with Phonetically Specific Lexical Competition and verbal number in Chini (Papuan) motion verbs: Explaining categorial change in the mind and in the community: Insights from bilingual phonetics and phonology. Competing Structures in the Bilingual Mind in the Bilingual Mind. The sociolinguistic approach views code-switching as a sociopragmatic English subject-verb agreement, Latin case. Competing Structures in the Bilingual Mind. A number of these effects of bilingualism (Rubio-Fernández & Glucksberg, 2011); Effects of verb constraint on lexical competition, Experiment 2 of Barr ( 2008). Utterance, tends to focus on either the structural factors or the social factors that govern in bilingual Tagalog-English speech, namely nominal pluralization and case/subjecthood mind. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 22-37. Conversational perspective taking, there were a number of investigations using traditional psycholinguistic methodologies (for review, see Barr & Keysar, 2006). A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Optional Verb Number Agreement. Tion of the lexicon and German verb semantics arguing that specific linguistic properties can mind (Fodor 1963), the modularity of language and the autonomy of syntax as Plural marking, a form of agreement, was investigated in the and number, should be impaired in SLI children, whereas tense marking , but also. A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Optional Verb Number Agreement, Vol. Competing Structures in the Bilingual Mind: A Psycholinguistic Investigation of Optional Verb Number Agreementmore. Effects of semantic integration on subject–verb agreement: How prosody is both mandatory and optional.